From paradise to target practice: Why Filipinos should say no to nuke capable

What is the benefit for Filipinos in flexing another country’s military power? Are we prepared to become the shield in someone else’s war?

The deployment of a US missile system in the Philippines has raised critical questions about its impact on our country’s peace, security, and sovereignty. The Typhon land-based missile system—capable of launching Standard Missile-6, Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles, and even nuclear weapons—is designed for offensive operations, including targeting mainland China. While some argue this strengthens regional security, its disadvantages far outweigh any perceived benefits.

Here are five reasons why Filipinos do not need such a system on their soil.

Increased risk of becoming a target

The Typhon missile system, with its ability to attack mainland China, turns the Philippines into a strategic target in global conflicts. This exposes Filipino communities to the threat of retaliatory strikes, putting lives and homes in harm’s way, especially near military installations. Meanwhile, Americans remain far from the frontlines, shielded from the immediate dangers of war.

Do we want our country to bear the cost of a conflict driven by foreign interests? Hosting such weapons risks leaving Filipinos to live in constant fear and uncertainty, with our homes and loved ones caught in the crossfire.

Economic strain on the nation

Hosting US nuke capable missile systems like Typhon imposes significant economic burdens on the Philippines. While these systems are created and maintained by the United States, the necessary infrastructure, security, and support demand substantial investments from the Philippine government. These resources could otherwise be allocated to critical sectors such as education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation—areas where the average Filipino feels the most pressing needs.

Meanwhile, the US reaps the economic benefits of missile development, increased defense production, and expanded military influence, leaving the Philippines to bear the risks without equitable gains. Adding to this challenge, the entangled relationship between the US and the Middle East complicates global trade dynamics. For a country like the Philippines, which relies heavily on imports, these geopolitical tensions could further strain economic stability and trade relations.

Escalation of tensions with nuke capable system

Hosting a US missile system escalates tensions with neighboring countries, particularly China, increasing the risk of military conflict. This could harm trade, disrupt economic activities, and negatively affect Filipino businesses as foreign investments may decline.

The tourism industry, a major economic driver, could also suffer. Before the pandemic, Chinese tourists were among the largest groups visiting the Philippines. However, since the pandemic, the country has struggled to reach pre-pandemic tourism targets. Heightened tensions could further deter potential visitors, jeopardizing the recovery of this vital sector and impacting the livelihoods of millions of Filipinos who depend on tourism.

Potential for environmental and health hazards

Systems capable of launching nuclear weapons carry inherent risks, including accidents or mishandling. The storage, testing, and maintenance of such weaponry could cause environmental degradation and expose nearby communities to long-term health hazards.

In a country already prone to natural disasters, the introduction of such man-made dangers only multiplies the risks faced by civilians.

Violation of the constitution

The deployment of a US missile system with nuclear capabilities raises serious concerns about the Philippines' autonomy, especially when considering the provisions of the Philippine Constitution. Article II, Section 7 asserts that "the state shall pursue an independent foreign policy," while Section 2 further emphasizes that "the Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy, adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land, and adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations."

Allowing foreign military systems like these contradicts the Constitution’s principles, as it could be seen as prioritizing foreign military interests over the nation’s commitment to peace and independence. This undermines the country’s constitutional obligation to pursue peaceful relations and self-reliance, while eroding efforts to maintain sovereignty and avoid unnecessary military escalation.

Filipino youth and young professionals hold the power to shape a peaceful and secure future for our nation. True stability comes not from aligning with superpower rivalries but through diplomacy, dialogue, and strengthening our own defense capabilities—choices that protect our sovereignty and resilience.

By advocating for peace and investing in self-reliance, we can ensure a future where Filipinos thrive without fear. Let’s prioritize unity, innovation, and progress to build a Philippines that values its people above all else. The path to a brighter future starts with choosing collaboration over conflict.